“A Living Wage is a Moral Wage.” Ummm ... No it’s not! It amounts 2 theft. U get what U earn. U R entitled 2 that & your God-given rights related 2 Life, Liberty & the PURSUIT of Happiness; nothing else! #myfirstpost http://bit.ly/bA2Cdw

Schools ban 'boobies' cancer bracelet ; Think There is a Double Standard?

A $4 rubber bracelet meant to raise breast cancer awareness has done that and more: Students nationwide are wearing the "I (heart) boobies" wristbands, and running afoul of school administrators.

Schools from California to Florida have banned the bracelets because they believe the "boobies" language is inappropriate. Read entire article here.

Inappropriate? Probably so. When I was growing up, the word 'boob' was traditionally a derogatory term for a woman's breast, and not the nicest word to be used in public. So, yes, in defense of the schools, I can understand why they would be concerned because of the broader "inappropriate" usage of the word. Check out the short video here.

However, If the word "boob" or "boobies" and any bracelets with those words on them are banned, then the schools must stop passing out condoms to teens in support of pre-marital teen sex. And parents must be notified before sending their daughters to an abortion clinic if these girls find themselves pregnant because they refuse to use such birth control!

That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it!

Should Freedom of Speech be Limited? Snyder v Phelps

Yesterday, Glenn Beck and his friend Pat were debating whether or now the Supreme Court should limit freedom of speech in regards to the lawsuit brought by the Snyder family against Pastor Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church. The video below will explain the latest news on the hearing:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Here's the discussion on Glenn's show from October 6, 2010:







Here are my thoughts on this whole ordeal. Yes, I think that what the Westboro congregation is doing and has been doing for many years is despicable! And I wish that this case hadn't gone as far as it has. But, in my opinion, with the two new justices on the bench under Obama's watch, I would be highly surprised if they rule in Westboro's favor, considering the heated debate on homosexuality in general. I still believe that everyone has a right to their opinions and core beliefs. I pray that the judges will keep that in mind as they make their decision. But I'm really afraid that they will take a radical step and ignore the First Amendment. My question is, what will come next ... The Bible being burned because of its content? Would anyone be surprised if the sacred written Word of God ends up being silenced within all churches because of a select few radicals who decided to take the scriptures way out of context?

This is why I strongly disagree with Westboro's tactics since they first went public with their rage. There is a big difference between judgment/condemnation of one's eternal soul and discernment. As Glenn has quoted Martin Luther King, Jr many times, you judge a man by his character; but it is not up to us to condemn anyone to eternal damnation. Ultimately, it's up to God to do that. This is where Westboro went wrong. Protesting is not wrong or illegal in and of itself - but to do so in this manner is insensitive, uncaring, and it puts a really bad name to Christianity as a whole. Honestly, I think Jesus Christ himself would be very sad to see this happening.

Thomas Jefferson on Judges

"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.”

—Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277

Note: You can also click on the title to see the original post by Michael Boldin.

The Constitution and Freedom

Judge Andrew Napolitano, the youngest life-tenured Superior Court Judge in the history of the State of New Jersey, discusses the basics of our founding fathers and the constitution.

This is really great work, and it must be taught in all schools in the United States. We must take America back!

Congressman Ron Paul Discusses the Current Economy

For the past year or so, I have been watching Congressman Ron Paul. and the more I get to know his principles, the more I pray that he will make another run for the White House in 2012. His common sense approach to economic recovery and fiscal responsibility is so important to many people in this country. He has stood up against big government unconstitutional intrusion on the private sector for more than 30 years while in "the people's seat," representing his Texas constituents. He has written books such as "End the Fed," which details what needs to be done to shut it down because all it does is control our money supply in order to devalue our dollar. This ultimately destroy the way of life our founding fathers warned us about over 230 years ago. Millions of people know about the unconstitutionality of the FED, the IRS and the personal income tax (thanks to the late Aaron Russo and his documentary film, Freedom to Fascism). I highly recommend that people see this video. You can also purchase it here for personal use if you so desire.

The following videos are what he has entitled "State of the Republic Address." According to his YouTube channel description of the videos, "Congressman Paul speaks on where we are as a nation and where we need to go." You can also visit his State of the Republic Address for the complete text of his speech.

Part 1







Part 2







Part 3

UN Climate Chief: Hacked E-mails Are Damaging

The UN Climate Change Summit in Copenhagan is going forward despite the hacked emails that show a deliberate cover-up of the truth behind the science. According to the UN Climate chief, he intends to go forward with an agreement that the US will reduce CO2 emissions up to 80 percent in the next 40 years - all at taxpayers expense, in addition to wealthy countries paying for poor countries. I guess that is part of what Barack Obama meant by "spreading the wealth."

In other words, the US government has no intention of putting a stop to this fraud.

Here's the video:



It is imperative that we contact our US Senators and Representatives and demand a full-scale investigation into this climate change fraud! We can't afford anymore spending! Put a stop to this NOW!!

Here's the link to find your Senators:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Here's the link to find your House of Representatives:

http://www.house.gov