Sunday, December 19, 2010

Progressives r going 2 hate this article. #tcot #amplify #RT

The entire article makes a lot of sense to those who understand common sense and put it into practice every day.

Amplify’d from thefamily.com

“The Difference between Conservative and Liberal or Progressive or Neocon.”

Dennis Adamson, for The Family

A young woman was about to finish her first year of college.  Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be very liberal, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words redistribution of wealth.

Read more at thefamily.com
 

Progressives r going 2 hate this article. #tcot

The entire article makes a lot of sense to those who understand common sense and put it into practice every day.

Amplify’d from thefamily.com

“The Difference between Conservative and Liberal or Progressive or Neocon.”

Dennis Adamson, for The Family

A young woman was about to finish her first year of college.  Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be very liberal, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words redistribution of wealth.

Read more at thefamily.com
 

Saturday, December 11, 2010

My Thoughts and Prayers with the Edwards Family

As we have heard, Elizabeth Edwards passed away this week after a long battle with cancer. I'd like to weigh in on how the general public feels and add my own thoughts.

As for John, let me give an example of how I understand what he is going through. My parents were divorced when I was very young. My father was an alcoholic and what they used to call a "womanizer." In other words, he used to chase women. I didn't see my father very much when I was little, but when I did, he had to adhere to rules set up by my mother. Most of the time, it was his children who made the request to see him.

Five years after my father sobered up, lived a clean, honorable life and regained the trust of four of his children, he died unexpectedly. Although my parents never re-married each other, they became good friends, and we included my father's second wife as a part of the family. I was supposed to move in with him after I graduated from high school.

How did my father's death affect my mother? She was understandably devastated. She lost a good friend and the father of her children. It took her a long time to cope with the loss, but her faith in God and the support of our church family and relatives got her through those times. Even my maternal grandparents learned to forgive my father for all the pain he had caused our family.

We all know about the sordid affair that John Edwards had and that it resulted in the birth of a child. There's no need to re-hash it or bring it up, especially now. Doesn't anyone have compassion and forgiveness anymore? It sure doesn't seem that way! I have seen tweets and facebook posts specifically about John since the day Elizabeth passed away that are too vulgar and cruel to repeat. To them I say, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone!" Doesn't anyone believe that John has the right to grieve his wife's death? I certainly do! He and Elizabeth may have been estranged, but she didn't keep him from seeing their children. I read that John was living in their house for the past few months but had a separate bedroom. They never divorced.

In the video below, John Moylan, a close friend and Edwards' advisor was interviewed by CBS the other day. Here's what he had to say:






Did anyone notice the answer given by Moylan in reference to the guardianship/custody of the two younger children? I noticed that he gave an excellent answer, because now is not the time to discuss that issue. Right now, the focus is getting all of them, including John, through each day, especially now that their mother is going to be laid to rest today. We need to show compassion for all of the Edwards family, including John. Put your hatred aside for once and pray for him, too!

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Hmm ... the uber wealthy want to be taxed more? Yeah right! #tcot #ocra #sgp #twisters #teaparty

I have an answer for them: Just don't claim so much on your taxes. No one is forcing you to claim your deductions, You only do it because -- Surprise! -- it reduces your tax liability!



Oh, but you wouldn't want to do that, because it's too hard to give up the luxury items you worked so hard for, like a private jet, huge mansions, overseas properties, yachts ... shall I go on? Just keep preaching your lies - we're on to you!



Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2010/11/28/abc-s-amanpour-trumpets-tax-us-more-liberal-democratic-quartet?utm_source=Newsbusters&utm_medium=twitter#ixzz16cda62Mv



My point is - The interviews Christiane did with Gates, Buffet, et al had nothing to do with taxing *them* more - it's really about hitting the middle class with higher rates.

Amplify’d from newsbusters.org

ABC’s Amanpour Trumpets ‘Tax Us More’ Liberal Democratic Quartet


At a time when the American mood has turned against excessive government spending, Christiane Amanpour devoted Sunday’s This Week to four liberal Democratic billionaires, though she failed to identify their political orientation, who want higher income tax rates on the wealthy.



Unmentioned during the pre-taped interviews with Warren Buffett, Bill and Melinda Gates, Ted Turner and Tom Steyer revolving around their participation in “The Giving Pledge” – the promise to give away at least half their wealth: how they are free now to give all the money they want to the federal government.



Amanpour began by touting: “Warren Buffett has been practically begging the country, begging Congress to tax him more. In fact, many of the richest Americans like Buffett, Bill and Melinda Gates and Ted Turner say that they should pay higher tax.” In between letting Buffett expound at length on why taxes should be hiked, she fretted to Bill Gates: “If people aren't going to pay for the services that they need, how are those services going to get funded, do you think?”


Later, she showcased Tom Steyer, founder of the San Francisco-based Farallon Capital Management hedge fund and, like Buffett, a big donor to Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign when Steyer gave over $100,000 to Democrats, a fact Amanpour ignored which makes his support for higher taxes a lot less surprising and hardly noteworthy. “You said that you would be willing to have your taxes higher,” she cued him up.



A complementary ABC News.com article by Joshua Miller, posted Sunday morning, screamed:

Billionaires Buffett and Gates: Tax Us More! Exclusive: Amanpour Interviews with Two of World's Richest Men
Read more at newsbusters.org
 

Another example of TSA sexual abuse #TSA #patdowns #sexualabuse #TheView #ElizabethHasselbeck

At the moment, I am thinking of the comment made by Elizabeth Hasselbeck on the episode of The View that aired the day after Thanksgiving. If you remember, Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar and Elisabeth Hasselbeck accuse We Won't Fly founders Jim Babb and George Donnelly of planning an terrorist act and say they should be on a watchlist.



However, if you read the article below, I wonder if these women would like to be the first to expose themselves to that. I'm shocked and very disappointed with Elizabeth Hasselbeck's so-called "conservative" viewpoint especially when it comes to TSA regulations and their blatant attack on our fourth amendment rights. It appears that Hasselbeck isn't as conservative as she wants us to believe.



So, Ms. Hasselbeck - if I may quote Benjamin Franklin: “They who give up liberty to obtain safety deserve neither.”

Amplify’d from island-adv.com

A self-described “rule follower” went through an airport pornoscanner wearing a panty-liner (she was menstruating). Because the hygienic item obscured the screener’s view of her vagina vulva, she was made to endure a humiliating fondling, “so invasive that I was left crying and dealing with memories that I thought had been dealt with years ago of prior sexual assaults.”

Read more at island-adv.com
 

Another example of TSA sexual abuse

At the moment, I am thinking of the comment made by Elizabeth Hasselbeck on the episode of "The View" that aired [I think] the day after Thanksgiving. Basically, Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar and Elisabeth Hasselbeck accuse We Won't Fly founders Jim Babb and George Donnelly of planning an terrorist act and say they should be on a watchlist.



I wonder if these ladies would like to be exposed to the same type of "pat-down" sexual assault during their menstrual cycle. Actually, I doubt they would have to worry about it, considering they probably get "free" flights on private jets most of the time. So, maybe they'd also be exempt from this assault. As Benjamin Franklin said, “They who give up liberty to obtain safety deserve neither.”

Amplify’d from island-adv.com

A self-described “rule follower” went through an airport pornoscanner wearing a panty-liner (she was menstruating). Because the hygienic item obscured the screener’s view of her vagina vulva, she was made to endure a humiliating fondling, “so invasive that I was left crying and dealing with memories that I thought had been dealt with years ago of prior sexual assaults.”

Read more at island-adv.com
 

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Napolitano did *not* answer the question abt Muslim women & full-body pat-downs #TSA #HHS #tcot #privacy

My opinion on this is simple: Janet Napolitano said "there will be adjustments" & "more to come." Excuse me, but I can't help but think the answer will be "No airport security checks for Muslim women." Obviously, she and TSA are stonewalling and giving us the same rhetorical responses as GW Bush did with the Patriot Act. And for her to also say that we have "collective role" is just another way of saying "America, you MUST give up your 4th Amendment rights in exchange for your security." Brown shirts did the same thing in Nazi Germany during WWII.



So, for those of you who are in total favor of this monstrosity, let me remind you by quoting Benjamin Franklin who said, "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Amplify’d from www.cnsnews.com

Napolitano: ‘Adjustments,’ ‘More to Come’ on Women in Hijabs Undergoing Airport Full-Body Pat-Downs

(CNSNews.com) - When asked today if she will insist that Muslim women wearing hijabs must go through full body pat downs before boarding planes, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano did not say yes or no, but told CNSNews.com there will be “adjustments” and “more to come” on the issue.

“On the pat downs, CAIR [the Council on American-Islamic Relations] has recommended that Muslim women wearing hijabs refuse to go through the full body pat downs before boarding planes,” CNSNews.com asked Napolitano at a Monday press conference. “Will you insist that they do go through full body pat downs before boarding planes?”

Read more at www.cnsnews.com