Glenn Beck has the guts to speak more of the truth. All week long, I have been watching a special series called, "The New Republic: America's Future. He has discussed many aspects of what is happening in Washington, describing in detail the people who surround Barack Obama in the White House. He's not afraid to call it as he sees it - Marxist, or Communist. Watch this and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
The Back-Door Agenda of the FCC - If Mark Lloyd has his way
The White House is diabolically trying to destroy those of us who are speaking out against their agenda. It’s not about the Fairness Doctrine. Obama has hired Mark Lloyd to be the Chief Diversity ‘Czar’ at the FCC. This is what Lloyd had to say about free speech and public radio and what he wants to do to shut down private radio and stifle those who disagree with the agenda of the White House:
On the First Amendment:
Prologue to a Farce – Mark Lloyd – Senior Fellow at Center for American Progress
“It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press … This freedom is all too often an exaggeration … At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.”
According to the diversity czar, he’s proposing that private radio companies pay 100% of their operating budget yearly. That tax will be sent to the state-run NPR. If they don’t pay it, they lose their license and it will be sold to a minority group. Basically, he’s calling for private radio stations to fund NPR (state-run).
In addition, he also states “In our report, we call for ownership of rules that we think will create greater local diversity of programming, news and commentary. And we call for more localism by putting more teeth into the licensing rules. But we do not call for a return of the fairness doctrine.”
At best (or worst), this is the back door approach to the fairness doctrine. How does this represent our First Amendment? Where is the mainstream media on this?
Check out two videos from Glenn Beck on YouTube:
On the First Amendment:
Prologue to a Farce – Mark Lloyd – Senior Fellow at Center for American Progress
“It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press … This freedom is all too often an exaggeration … At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.”
According to the diversity czar, he’s proposing that private radio companies pay 100% of their operating budget yearly. That tax will be sent to the state-run NPR. If they don’t pay it, they lose their license and it will be sold to a minority group. Basically, he’s calling for private radio stations to fund NPR (state-run).
In addition, he also states “In our report, we call for ownership of rules that we think will create greater local diversity of programming, news and commentary. And we call for more localism by putting more teeth into the licensing rules. But we do not call for a return of the fairness doctrine.”
At best (or worst), this is the back door approach to the fairness doctrine. How does this represent our First Amendment? Where is the mainstream media on this?
Check out two videos from Glenn Beck on YouTube:
"If You Like Your Coverage, You Can Keep it!" - With a few Exceptions
On page 16 of the 1,018-page bill under the Orwellian header of "Protecting The Choice to Keep Current Coverage," the "Limitation on New Enrollment" section of the bill clearly states:
"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law."
So we can all keep our coverage, just as promised - with just a couple of exceptions: those who currently have private coverage won't be able to change it. Nor will those who leave a company to work for themselves be free to buy individual plans from private carriers.
What part of this do people on the left have trouble understanding? We the people have already read either parts of this bill, or the entire thing from start to finish. It stinks! This is why the town hall meetings are so fired up and why the liberal representatives won't listen to the people during these town hall meetings. Wake up liberals!! We the people don't want this!!
"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law."
So we can all keep our coverage, just as promised - with just a couple of exceptions: those who currently have private coverage won't be able to change it. Nor will those who leave a company to work for themselves be free to buy individual plans from private carriers.
What part of this do people on the left have trouble understanding? We the people have already read either parts of this bill, or the entire thing from start to finish. It stinks! This is why the town hall meetings are so fired up and why the liberal representatives won't listen to the people during these town hall meetings. Wake up liberals!! We the people don't want this!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)